Mystery Plane, Cash, Drugs And Maybe CIA 2

Some time ago, I wrote a blog post called: The Story Of The Mystery Plane, The Cash, The Drugs And Maybe The CIA. Well, hold on to your hats because here is part two of that story. But firstly, a brief recap:

A few weeks ago, members of the Australian Federal Police and the New South Wales Middle Eastern Organised Crime Squad, conducted a raid on an eight seat private plane, a US-registered Swearingen Merlin 3 twin turbo prop, parked on the tarmac at Illawarra airport, a tiny, regional hub south of Sydney. It was real cops and robbers stuff. About 20 police in vehicles, literally surrounded the plane. The local newspaper was tipped off and took plenty of pictures.

A 43-year-old Wollongong pilot, Bernard Stevermuer, was arrested and charged with being part of a criminal organisation and dealing with the proceeds of crime. He is currently on bail.

Police allege a major international crime syndicate was using the airport to import guns and drugs for distribution throughout southwest Sydney. The syndicate was allegedly operated by two other men, who police claim have links to a number of New South Wales outlaw motorcycle gangs.

Police claim to have documents which show that the syndicate commissioned Stevermuer to buy the plane in the United States for $US400,000 provided by a mortgage company in Sydney. But as you will discover, the purchase was very complicated and full of intrigue. Police also allege that documents show Stevermuer, had mysteriously come into a lot of money and was prepared to pay $A1.5 million to buy two business at Illawarra Regional Airport. Several aviation sources say Stevermuer was in negotiations to buy the flight training organization, NSW Air and the Aerial Patrol shark-spotting plane service, both based at the airport.

Police allege these businesses were designed to act as a legitimate front to hide criminal activities. But when Stevermuer offered a $300,000 cash deposit, the vendor became suspicious and the sale fell through. When Police arrested the Wollongong pilot they discovered 36 kg of an illegal drug, which they are refusing to name, but believed to be heroin, with a street value of $A9 million, as well as $70,000 cash.

But then the story gets even murkier.

If you do a search of US Federal Aviation Administration records, you will discover, that an organisation called the Oregonian Aero Club, with an address listed in Wilmington, Delaware, previously owned the Swearingen Merlin 3 aircraft.

But the fact that this club has a registered office in Delaware might be an extremely significant clue. Delaware is one of the strangest states in the United States, in terms of corporate law specifically if you happen to be in the business of asset management.

Those types of companies, incorporated in Delaware, enjoy freedom and secrecy similar to clients of other highly secretive organisations like the Vatican Bank or financial institutions in the Cayman Islands. Asset Management companies with aircraft and yachts, advertise registration in Delaware as a way of minimising tax and personal liability because the assets are automatically registered as belonging to a trustee corporation rather than an individual. Making it a great place to hide if that was your wish.

And it turns out that the person who bought the plane on behalf of Oregonian was none other than Australian pilot Bernard Stevermuer, who has just been arrested by Australian police.

The papers list Stevermuer as the purchaser of the plane acting for an Aero Club that doesn’t exist. Nothing wrong with that you might say. Except, why would an Australian pilot and skydiving instructor, who doesn’t live in the United States, travel across the world to buy a 42-year-old plane? There is nothing in the least exceptional about this model of aircraft. Even more unusual, Why would a club want to sell its only aircraft, two weeks after it had purchased it listing an Australian as the buyer? None of this makes sense unless there was another agenda being followed.

Stevermuer wasn’t purchasing from a broker that buys and sells aircraft all the time. The Oregonian Aero club has no headquarters, web address, telephone numbers, aircraft (apart from this one 42 year old plane) or members. In fact none of the other aero clubs in the area know anything about it.

It turns out the plane at the centre of all of this intrigue is a Swearingen Merlin 3 twin turbo prop. It is best described as a stealth plane. By that I mean there is no record, whatsoever, of it arriving in Australia. In fact the last known official record concerning this aircraft shows it flew into the Philippines on May 5, 2014, after a two-month journey from the United States. But the Swearingen Merlin 3 had been pretty busy up until the time it left for the Philippines. It flew for a couple of weeks from Punta Gorda in Florida via Missouri and Texas and then to California and finally Washington State.

Flight records indicate the plane left Seattle, Washington on the 30th of April 2014. It touched down at Cold Bay, Alaska, a village of 108 people, one shop, one hotel and an airport. The next day the aircraft flew to Honolulu and then the Marshall islands, a series of atolls in the Pacific Ocean. Next stop was the US airbase at Guam before arriving in the Philippines capital, Manila.

But what happened to the plane after that is a total mystery. It clearly entered Australia some way but what route it took is anyone’s guess. What is also apparent, whoever was flying this plane, took extraordinary steps to remain undetected. By that I mean entering Australia at one of its most remote and least habited geographic points, flying visually, without instruments, at low altitude, for long periods under radar.

That would have taken the expertise and daring of an extremely skilled pilot.

The next record of contact between this plane, registered NH224HR, and a control tower, was at Coffs Harbour in northern New South Wales on the 27th of June 2014. The plane radioed in that it was bound for Illawarra airport. And that’s where it’s been ever since, on the tarmac, until the police raid.

The next obvious question is who flew the plane illegally into Australia? At this point in time we don’t know the answer to that question. So let’s talk about what we do know. Sometimes fact can be way stranger than fiction.

The contract to ferry the Swearingen Merlin 3 from the United States to the Philippines was undertaken by an Australian company called Snow Goose International. Snow Goose was engaged by the Oregonian Aero Club, which of course exists in name only. So it might be fair to assume that Snow Goose might know the principals behind Oregonian. If they do, they are not saying. In fact Snow Goose released a statement saying their job was to ferry the plane to the Philippines, which they did, At all times the flights were planned and approved by the appropriate authorities. Communication was maintained at all times by High Frequency Radio in accordance with international requirements. Snow Goose has no knowledge of what happened to the plane after they ferried it to the Philippines nor does it have any knowledge of how it ended up illegally in Australia.

Snow Goose is a very interesting company. It’s Director and Chief Pilot is David Baddams, a Member Of The British Empire. On the company website, he is listed as an ex-Navy fighter pilot with 40 years flying experience on many aircraft types including the Sea Harrier, BAE Hawk and the Douglas A4 Skyhawk. Since leaving the Navy in 1999, Baddams has remained closely involved in aviation as the business development manager of a military flying training school, a highly experienced flying instructor, an aircraft salesman and as the Chief Pilot and director of an airborne surveillance company.  He has many years and many hours experience on numerous aircraft.

I am certainly not inferring or suggesting that David Baddams had anything whatsoever to do with ferrying the Swearingen from the Philippines to Australia. There is no evidence whatsoever to suggest or infer he was involved. Nor is there any evidence to suggest or infer that he was involved in anything illegal.

But there is also no denying that he had the flying expertise and the skill set to undertake the most perilous of flying journeys in a small plane for example, from the United States to the Philippines. Snow Goose International regularly posted photographic updates of the Swearingen ferrying job to the Philippines on its company Facebook page. A photo posted by Snow Goose International on April 30 showed Baddams and a man seated beside him the cockpit of a plane, with the caption: “It’s Bernie!!! He is back!” The man sitting next to him is Bernie Stevermuer.

Another photo, posted on June 13, was captioned: “Here she comes! On the pan at Clark about to continue on her journey with the owner!” The caption is referring to the tarmac at Clark Air Force base in the Philippines.

On the same date, Baddams commented: “Here she comes to Australia! It’s N224HR, the one we brought across the Pacific!”

But how the Swearingen Merlin 3 ended up in Australia and who flew her from the Philippines remains an intriguing mystery.

In part three of this series, we’ll be examining how the CIA might be linked to this case, its practice of “sheep dipping” planes and how the Swearingen that ended up in Australia, might have been originally owned by the American spy agency.

Never Try And Negotiate With A Debt Collector

Here’s a story that could happen to anyone but you’d hope it never does.

It concerns a London financial journalist, who made the mistake of opening a debt collector’s letter addressed to the previous occupant of the place she had just bought and the nightmare that ensued when she did. Her horror story began not long after she became the owner of a London flat. There were letters addressed to the previous occupant, one of which was from a debt collector, relating to 453 pounds owed in unpaid rent including the debt collector’s fee of 214 pounds.

She called her solicitor, who quite rightly told her it was nothing to do with her and they instructed her to forward the letter to them and they would sort it out with the vendor’s solicitors. And, if she had left it at that, there might not have been a problem.

But she didn’t and there was. In an attempt to be super helpful the financial journalist, who quite frankly should have known better, telephoned the debt collection agency and told them the individual they were pursuing no longer lived at the address. She would later explain that her motivation for making that telephone call, had to do with her upbringing and being taught to avoid debt at any cost. For that reason she does not have an overdraft, never owes money on her credit card nor does she miss a payment of any kind. It’s kind of weird but it works for her.

But clearly she had not the slightest clue who she was dealing with. Firstly, debt collection agencies have heard every excuse that has ever been used. Secondly, if they can match a name with an address that owes them money they are never going to let go. And that’s what happened in this case.

A week later, after the telephone conversation, the financial journalist received another letter from the debt collector. This time it was addressed to her and not the previous occupant. It made all manner of menacing threats such as notifying her mortgage lender, except being the thrifty person that she was she didn’t have a mortgage. Anyway, the letter was threatening enough to be unsettling.

Obviously there was an ongoing problem, so our financial journalist tried telephoning the debt collector for a second time. All she wanted to do was sort it out and enter a dialogue to resolve the situation. What she didn’t understand was that the only dialogue a debt collector is interested in is cold, hard cash. In other words: show me the money. Her attempt to reach a resolution through negotiation was met by a brick wall. The voice at the end of the telephone told her that their client had instructed them to collect the debt from her and that was the instruction they were going to follow.

It was just the beginning. Over the coming weeks, our financial journalist came to dread receiving the post because the demands for payment just keep coming. Her attempts to stop them proved futile. She tried contacting the UK Credit Services Association that represents debt collectors and has a complaints procedure but the firm demanding money from her was not a member. In her desperation to escape the quicksand, she even considered paying the debt in full, even though she didn’t owe it, to end the constant stress and the billowing administration charges. But her solicitor advised her against it.

Finally, she received the notice you get before legal action, with the threat of bailiffs entering her home and seizing her goods. She knew then she had to do something decisive to make it all stop.

In one way she was lucky. As a financial journalist she had access to some of the UK’s top credit experts. They helped her to write a letter of complaint. But not some stock standard, run-of-the-mill letter of complaint. This letter used very precise language that only debt collectors understand. For example, instead of writing: this isn’t my debt, she wrote: I dispute this debt. And if by magic it worked. The matter was placed on hold while an investigation took place.

Six months after the beginning of her nightmare, she finally received a letter telling her she didn’t owe any money, which is what she had been trying to say all along except no-one at the debt collection agency was listening. The matter is officially closed.

But according to a credit reference expert it is not uncommon for people to find themselves pursued relentlessly by debt collectors and trapped in a cycle from which there is no escape. This situation is only made worse by the fact that books of debt are often on sold to other organisations many times, losing sight of the original authority. The more organisations that become involved, the harder it is to break free especially if the debt was never yours in the first place.

The authority in the United Kingdom, responsible for regulating the credit industry, which includes debt collectors, is promising an overhaul of existing regulations. The moral to this story, if there is one, is never attempt to talk your way out of a letter of demand from a debt collection agency. Instead, tell them you are disputing the debt. If you don’t believe you are liable, then there is an absolute onus on the collection agency to prove that you are.